Thursday, March 28, 2019

BOBBEE BEE: Politics of Corruption: Taking a closer look a college sports

Politics of Corruption: Taking a closer look a college sports


By
Updated: June 22, 2014


With the recent scandal involving Texas A&M’s Johnny Manziel and the current scandal involving UNC’s Rashard McCants, we, at BlackAthlete.com, felt it was necessary to re-publish this excellent article, especially after NCAA President Mark Emmert was cross-examined for the O’Bannon v. NCAA case on Thursday.
NORTH CAROLINA–(BASN)”In life, never forget the golden rule. Those with the gold make the rules.” The government of the United States should investigate the BCS and the NCAA like it was the MOB.
It should infiltrate it as if it was a Mega Church full of prosperity pimps or a drug cartel.
Why? Because according to certain reports, a university like THE OHIO STATE can make millions of dollars a year while an athlete, like Terrelle Pryor “shamefully” makes $40,000 from signing his autograph on a few sports items, is criminalized and vilified.
While pondering that scenario, one must conclude that the NCAA is a bunch of white collar criminals.
They are, in fact, no different from these corporate CEOs, who make millions of dollars off of cheap labor in “so-called” third world countries. But for some odd reason, the media focuses its attention on punishing those, who commit blue collar “crimes.”payme
The Blame Game
Therefore, they accuse Reggie Bush rather than USC for the problem.
They blame Cam Newton instead of Mississippi State for the problem.
They punish Terrelle Pryor instead of Ohio State for the problem.
As a result, in the end, they bailout the universities instead of the players like President Obama bailed out the bankers on Wall Street. This is similar to the War on Drugs in the USA, where they lock up petty street hustlers or the small time drug users instead of arresting the big-time drug kingpins.
Former Ohio State (RB) Maurice Clarett confirmed this recently on the Dan Patrick Show when he said, “It’s not a Terrelle Pryor problem. It’s not a Jim Tressel problem, it’s a culture….” ‘
Clarett was correct.
The problem begins and ends with a culture that has been corrupt from the top down, and not from the bottom up.
A System of Pimps and Hoes
To be brutally honest, college athletics is a system of pimps and hoes.
To prove this point, recently South Carolina Gamecocks football head coach Steve Spurrier offered a payment proposal, where the coaches would pay the players $300 a game out of their own pockets.
But many sports analysts felt that Spurrier’s proposal to pay players was simply a clever recruiting tool for South Carolina and the SEC. “A bunch of us coaches felt so strongly about it that we would be willing to pay it–70 guys 300 bucks a game.”
“This is only $21,000 a game. I doubt it will get passed, but as coaches in the SEC, we make all the money, as do universities, and television. And we need to get more to our players….” said Spurrier, who makes $2.5 million a year not including other bonuses.
If this ain’t a pimp-move, I don’t know what is. The Fear of Socialism in Sports Spurrier’s proposal to pay players, in effect, had a few shrewd capitalists feeling as if he was practicing some weird form of Socialism.
But did Spurrier really want to “share the wealth” like President Obama suggested during his 2008 campaign? According to NCAA President Mark Emmert, Spurrier’s payment proposal would destroy the “sacredness” of college athletics.
“I think paying players by game doesn’t make any sense to me at all.” Emmert said.
“Are you going to pay them for every game they go to, are you going to pay them for women’s volleyball, and why $300, why not $600, why not $1000. If you are just paying them for a game why not $3,000?” he scolded. “Where do you set that number and why do you set that number? That’s converting student-athletes into employees and I’m adamantly opposed to that and I think that would be the death of intercollegiate athletics.” millions
Despite Emmert’s disapproval of paying college athletes, he can’t deny the fact that college sports is a big business.
College athletics is a Big Business.
How big a business is it?
According to the dailybeast.com, during the 20 day basketball extravaganza known as March Madness, the NCAA makes $185 million on corporate sponsorships plus $300 million off of NCAA merchadise sales, while $770 million is spend on TV license fees, $613.8 million on television advertisement, and $7.5 million on beer sells.
Seeing those numbers, there is no question, college athletics is a big business.
And to understand the game, just like politics, one must follow the money.
Politics of Corruption
ccaWhy? Because there is a Politics of Corruption running college sports.
What do I mean by a politics of corruption? When you look at the word politics, the first part of the word “poli” which means many.
And the last part of the word is tics, which means a bloodsucker.
Therefore, by definition the term politics means “many bloodsuckers.”
And without a doubt, we all have to agree that the NCAA is sucking the life force of these young college athletes by collecting billions of dollars annually off of their blood, sweat, and tears.
Even though we know that this form of economic exploitation is wrong, the philosophy of college sports of see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil protects this evil empire.
Football Rules million
Why? Because there is a code of silence that governs the game.
For instance, you know the old saying, What happens in Vegas; Stays in Vegas.
Well, that phrase is a little different in college sports.
The motto for many universities: is football rules or basketball rules.
Therefore, there are no rules.
Why? Because, football is the cash cow.
And you are not going to kill the holy cow, if it is worshipped and viewed as being sacred by the people in order to feed a few hungry athletes hamburgers for dinner. But this golden calf must be destroyed just like Moses, the Lawgiver, did in the Bible….
In other words, there must be some new laws or commandments to govern this growing entity.
caspA system driven by greed.
According to Jesse Jackson, of the Rainbow Push Coalition, Capitalism only works if they are checks and balances.
Well, if it is true for Capitalism, it is true for the NCAA.
But this will be a difficult task, because greed drives both of these institutions.
And in a world, where we worship the rich and despise the poor, the rich will always get richer.
Not surprisingly, the NCAA is a microcosm of the macrocosm.
In other words, it is a capitalistic system based off of exploitation, where profit over the people is the law of the land.
Or should I say, profit over the players is the law of the field or the court.
But now this capitalistic system is slowly collapsing, as more universities are being investigated.
And with each investigation, more scandals are surfacing.
Why? Because the NCAA is not a democracy.
It is not governed of, for, and by the people or the players.
It is a plutocracy.
Rich getting richer pluto
A plutocracy means ruled for the rich by the rich.
And a plutocracy’s only purpose is to protect the wealth of the rich.
Therefore, the biggest threat to a plutocracy is for the peasants or the players to revolt against the system.
The sense of rebellion can be seen with the new “one and done” phenomenon occurring in college basketball. But let’s remember the famous words of Frederick Douglas, who said “Power concedes nothing without demand Therefore, maybe all college athletes should unite, organize and boycott the NCAA and create and articulate a list of demands.
This type of athletic alliance could spark a revolution in college sports like none other and potentially change the way the game is played.
If this happens, then, and only then, will the ball truly be in the hands of the players.
If this doesn’t happen, college athletes will continue to be exploited while the rich get richer and richer.
Eric D.Graham is a graduate of Winston-Salem State University, where he received a B.A. in Mass Communication with a concentration in Radio and Television and a minor in History, with an emphasis in African-American Studies. Currently, he is the Editor and Chief of Black Athlete Sports Network, where his articles appear daily along with his controversial cartoon character Bobbee Bee “The Hater.”Graham can be reached at lbiass34@yahoo.com


Monday, March 11, 2019

BOBBEE BEE: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE NEW MICHAEL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE NEW MJ DOCUMENTARY

Disclaimer: this article is not intended as a review of Leaving Neverland, which I have not seen, but rather of the context behind the allegations in the documentary.

When Michael Jackson died in 2009, Wade Robson—the former choreographer whose allegations of abuse are at the center of a controversial new documentary, Leaving Neverland—wrote in tribute to his friend: Michael Jackson changed the world and, more personally, my life forever. He is the reason I dance, the reason I make music, and one of the main reasons I believe in the pure goodness of humankind.

He has been a close friend of mine for 20 years. His music, his movement, his personal words of inspiration and encouragement and his unconditional love will live inside of me forever. I will miss him immeasurably, but I know that he is now at peace and enchanting the heavens with a melody and a moonwalk.



Robson was twenty-seven years old at the time. Four years earlier, he testified at Jackson’s 2005 trial (as an adult) that nothing sexual ever happened between them. Prior to the trial Robson hadn’t seen Jackson for years and was under no obligation to be a witness for the defense. He faced a withering cross-examination, understanding the penalty of perjury for lying under oath. But Robson adamantly, confidently, and credibly asserted that nothing sexual ever happened. In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, ONE.

Robson admitted he wanted the job “badly,” but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position. In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to “crumble.” That same year, with Robson’s career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up. In 2013, Robson filed a $1.5 billion dollar civil lawsuit/creditor’s claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late ‘80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.

It is tempting for the media to tie Jackson into a larger cultural narrative about sexual misconduct. R. Kelly was rightfully taken down by a documentary, and many other high-profile figures have been exposed in recent years, so surely, the logic goes, Michael Jackson must be guilty as well. Yet that is a dangerous leap—particularly with America's history of unjustly targeting and convicting black men—that fair-minded people would be wise to consider more carefully before condemning the artist. It is no accident that one of Jackson’s favorite books (and movies) was To Kill a Mockingbird, a story about a black man—Tom Robinson—destroyed by false allegations. The media’s largely uncritical, de-contextualized takes out of Sundance seem to have forgotten: no allegations have been more publicly scrutinized than those against Michael Jackson.

They elicited a two-year feeding frenzy in the mid-90s and then again in the mid-2000s, when Jackson faced an exhaustive criminal trial. His homes were ransacked in two unannounced raids by law enforcement. Nothing incriminating was found. Jackson was acquitted of all charges in 2005 by a conservative Santa Maria jury. The FBI, likewise, conducted a thorough investigation. Its 300-page file on the pop star, released under the Freedom of Information Act, found no evidence of wrongdoing. (Forbes) (bobbeethehater.blogspot.com)

BOBBEE BEE: THE CURSE OF POTIPHAR'S WIFE

"Look,’ she said to them, ‘this Hebrew . . . came in here to sleep with me, but I screamed. When he heard me scream for help, he left his cloak beside me and ran out of the house’” Genesis 39: 14–15)

THE CURSE OF POTIPHAR'S WIFE
 by eric d. graham

In the age of Donald Trump, where we have seen several powerful men fall at the hands of the #MeToo movement . We, however, can't forget about those, who, historically, have been falsely accused in the past. Especially, with the recent arrest of Empire actor Jussie Smollett, who has been indicted by a grand jury in Chicago on 16 felony counts after allegedly lying to police , about being attacked by two men, who poured bleach over him, while placing a noose around his neck . And, just last week, HBO documentary, Leaving Neverland, broadcasted alleged victims Wade Robson and James Safechuck's story about Michael Jackson allegedly molesting them, all over the airwaves to be debated and discussed in the court of public opinion.

With all of these cases of sexual assault during this TimesUp & MeToo movement along with the recent arrest of Bill Cosby and singer R.Kelly, we must be aware of The Curse of Potiphar’s Wife, which occurs in the Book of Genesis Chapter 39:1-23, that tells the story of Joseph, who was falsely accused of rape and was thrown in prison.

This biblical narrative, oddly, can be seen in several historical cases, which has shaped the conscious of America: from the Scottsboro Boys, who were nine Black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women aboard a train near Scottsboro, Alabama, in 1931. Or, the Central Park Five, which involved five Black and Latino teenagers from Harlem in 1989, who were falsely accused of assaulting and raping a white woman in Central Park, which (now) President Donald Trump spent $85,000 placing full-page ads in the four daily papers in New York City, calling for the return of the death penalty.

Yes. The Curse of Potiphar's Wife has been permeating throughout our community for several years. Seriously, how can we ever forget the lynching of 14-year old Emmett Till, who was brutally murdered in Mississippi in 1955 for allegedly flirting with a white woman or Susan Smith, who, in late October of 1994, alleged that a Black man- carjacked her vehicle and kidnapped her sons, when in fact she had murdered them herself.

Plus, let's not forget, the 2006 Duke Lacrosse case, where Crystal Gail Mangum, a black student at NCCU, who was working as a stripper, falsely accused three white Duke University students – all members of the Duke Blue Devils men's lacrosse team of raping her.

Oh yes, this curse crosses both racial and economic barriers. No one is immune to it. But, with all of these past cases of false allegations, one, would think; things are getting better.

Sadly, they are not. For instance, R & B singer Chris Brown was just released without charges after he was questioned by the Paris police over a rape accusation. And, when, you thought, things couldn't get any worse, on Thursday, a McLennan County jury- found former Baylor University football player, Shawn Oakman, not guilty of raping another student in 2016.

The case involving Oakman was linked to a sex scandal that rocked the University of Baylor and led to the departure of several top leaders.

Oakman's case is different yet similar to Brian Banks, who was 16 years old in 2002, with a promising football career ahead of him at USC, was falsely accused of raping, 15-year old, Wanetta Gibson, who later admitted she lied.

With the charges of rape, Banks was tried as an adult and faced 41 years to life. While serving 5 years in prison, upon release, he had to register as a sex offender and couldn't live within 2,000 yards of a school or park.

And, even though, Banks story had a happy ending, similar to the biblical character Joseph, with him working for the NFL in the football operations department at the beginning of the 2014 season, others, however, continue to end up with innocent men murdered or locked behind bars.
So, beware of The Curse of Potiphar’s Wife. (bobbeethehater.blogspot.com)